GSL logo Copyright 1999-2005 GeoSeismic Labs -- Earthquake Precursor Research

Earthquake
Precursor
Research



©GeoSeismic Labs 2005.


Graphic: Map of West Coast Volcanoes
Valid CSS!

GeoSeismic Labs Reports: June Edition

All information reported here is based upon data collection and analysis using procedures that are considered "experimental" and might be of a shocking nature to some individuals. Read and use at your own risk!

GSL's Reports have Been Viewed [Picture]  Times Since May 11, 2005





MT ULF Updates: M5.6 San Jacinto Fault Alert & Other Advisories

Late Breaking News Updates

Most Recently Reviewed Acoustic Emission Spectrogram

Gulf of California M5.7 Magneto-Telluric Precursor

North American Volcanic Unrest and Eruption Updates

Predicted Times for Spring Tides during the Month of June 2005

Please Make a Small Contribution to the Lab





Mount St. Helens Volcano Eruption Update:

U.S. Geological Survey, Vancouver, Washington
University of Washington, Pacific Northwest Seismograph Network, Seattle, Washington

Mount St. Helens Volcano, June 12, 2005 9:30 a.m. PDT (1630 UTC)

Current status is Volcano Advisory (Alert Level 2); aviation color code ORANGE


The Latest Eruption Update for the Unrest at Mt. Saint Helens, WA

Definition of Alert Levels

Mount St. Helens Satellite Imagery

For additional information, background, images, and other graphics, please visit:

Pacific Northwest Seismic Network

Caution: You may need to refresh the displayed page in order to view the latest live Volcano-Webcam.

Graphic: Mt. Saint Helens Webcam
Graphic: Popocatepetl Volcano  Webcam
Graphic: Major Volcanoes of Gorda Ridge


Links to Phenomena Associated with Earthquakes
&
Super-Volcanoes Worldwide

Earthquake Prediction: Great Britain

Volcano Hell: BBC2 Video Clips

Geologists Warn of SuperVolcano Threat: Great Britain

Magnetic Reversals on Earth-Possible Implications: Austria

Icelandic water making waves in seismology: Iceland

Earthquakes—Rattling the Earth’s Plumbing System: USA

Earthquake Lights: Kobe Earthquake in Japan 1995: Japan

Unlocking the mystery of 'Earthquake Clouds'

Novel Mobile and Portable Methods for Detecting Rock Failure: Great Britain

Amatuer Seismic Centre: India

Recent Infrasonics Associated with Deep
Crustal Resonant Frequency Activity along
the Pacific and North American Plate Boundary

Graphic:(AE)Infrasonic Spectrogram Infrasonic harmonic waves, which appear to be associated
with the San Jacinto fault zone in Southern California.
- GeoSeismic Labs 2005.

View Other Recently Reviewed Acoustic Emission Spectrograms




The Great Sumatra Earthquake and Tsunami
December 26, 2004 (Updated 05/09/2005)

Rupture Area Map
Sumatra Earthquake Global Displacement Wavefield
Graphic: Tsunami's Global Map

Mw 8.9 earthquake in Sumatra on December 26th, 2004 at 00:58 UTC

The Great Earthquake and Tsunami of 26 December 2004 in Southeast Asia

Preliminary report of numerical computation of tsunamis
generated by the December 26, 2004
Off Sumatra Island Earthquake, Indonesia


India’s last active volcano erupts in Andaman Islands

Info about Barren 1 Active Volcano in Andaman Islands, India

The Indian Ocean Tsunami

The Latest Official Information on Active Volcanoes in Sumatra, Indonesia

The Tsunami Page: Tsunamis of the 21st Century Quake may be 'imminent' warns tsunami expert

Volcanic Cone Collapses and Tsunamis

  • An unstable volcano is a potential source for a Tsunami.

  • Weakened and fractured material may give way and cause a collapse.

  • The most common cause is intrusion of magma, which causes a detachment.

  • Injection of magma into the interior of the volcano causes the volcanic cones to inflate, and the magma pushes out part of the volcano. Magma filling steep faults and fractures can provide a lubricated surface along which collapse may take place. The pore pressure within a volcano may increase owing to the presence of intruding magma, the volcano being squeezed by geological (tectonic) stresses; extra water within the volcano caused by increased rainfall, or a change in the local drainage system.

  • Earthquakes that "shake" the volcano.

  • Weakening of the volcano caused by heat and hot fluids in the interior of the volcano that alter hard volcanic rocks into soft clay.

  • Slippage along the surface on which the volcano is built, caused by a low-angle fault or lubricants such as clays or injected magma.

  • The volcano becomes too steep and high, regular volcanic eruptions pile more and more volcanic materials onto the upper slopes of the volcano which then is susceptible to collapse through gravity.

    Historical Cone Collapses in the Southwest Pacific

    Ritter (PNG) 1888. Major cone collapse without signs of volcanic eruptions
    led to the formation of a Tsunami 12 to 15 meters high on nearby islands. An early missionary
    map shows the positions of villages in western New Britain that no longer exist. Several
    hundred people were probably killed.

    Ambae (Vanuatu) 1913. A lateral collapse after a large earthquake generated a landslide that
    Caused possibly about 50 deaths.

    White Island (New Zealand) 1914. This volcano located 48 kilometers offshore from the
    North Island has a horse-shoe shaped crater just above sea-level. Part of the crater rim
    collapsed along a fault on or about September 10th and fell to the crater floor. There were 11
    fatalities. No Tsunamis were reported.

    Ruapehu (New Zealand) 1953. The upper portion of Ruapehu's crater wall failed on Christmas
    Eve releasing more than 1 million cubic meters of Crater Lake waters. The collapse was
    relatively small but resulted in a devastating lahar that swept away a railway bridge as the
    main Wellington-Auckland express train was crossing and 151 lives were lost in what has
    become known as the Tangwai Disaster.

    Tinakula (Solomon Islands) 1966. A landslide of unknown cause slipped into the sea from
    the high wall of an ancient avalance amphitheater. There may have been a Tsunami but no
    lives were lost.

    Lopevi (Vanuatu) 1975. A landslide associated with a lava flow from the summit crater
    plunged into the sea. No Tsunami was recorded but the residents have now been permanently evacuated.

    - Australian Geological Survey, Geological Survey of Papua New Guinea

    Mt. Ruapehu-Crater-Lake (Fact Sheet)

    Early Warnings When the Volcano Starts to Slip

    Cumbre Vieja Volcano - Potential Collapse and Tsunami at La Palma, Canary Islands

    MAR-2005: Bulletin of the Global Volcanism Network

    (WOVO) World Organization of Volcano Observatories

    Maps of Volcanoes located within the North American Continent

    Map of North American Volcanoes

    Map of Aleutian Volcanoes

    Map of Nevada Volcanoes

    Map of Volcanic Hazard Zones for California

    Major Volcanoes of Mexico

    General Location Map of the Long Valley area, California

    Eastern California Shear Zone
    CA/NV Border/Eastern Sierras/Yellowstone/Cascades
    Tectonic and Volcanic Activity

    Mount St. Helens Erupts Again: Activity from September 2004 through March 2005

    An Assessment of Volcanic Threat and Monitoring Capabilities in the U.S.:
    Framework for a National Volcano Early Warning System


    Birth of a Fault: Kern County to Walker Pass

    Probing Volcanoes: USGS Public Lecture in Multimedia .wmv (12/4/2004)

    Yellowstone Supervolcano: Transcript

    The 1700 Seattle SuperQuake & Japanese Tsunami: Nature

    How Volcanoes Work

    Yellowstone Swarm Report: 2004

    Volcanoes of Canada

    The Long Valley Caldera: White Mountains Region

    Living With a Restless Caldera:Long Valley, California

    Future Eruptions in California's Long Valley Area--What's Likely

    Adobe Hills Volcanic Field

    Summary of Holocene eruptive activity and probable greatest hazards from future eruptions at volcanic centers in California

    Eruptions from the Inyo chain about 600 Years ago: sequence of events and effects in the Long Valley Area

    Long Valley Tilt Meters

    Photo Gallery of the Long Valley area, California

    ERS radar interferometry reveals strain transient in the Eastern California Shear Zone

    Lithospheric Dynamics and Continental Deformation

    USGS California Tiled 2 Degree Maps

    USGS California Quarternary Fault and Fold Database Maps

    Earthquake Prediction & Forecasting Techniques

    USGS 24 hour Seismic Forecast

    Predicting an Earthquake

    Earthquake Prediction

    EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION: Some Basic Principles

    Earthquake Prediction: Predicting the Unpredictable?

    Time-Dependent Viscoelastic Stress Transfer and Earthquake Triggering

    Inferring Viscous Properties of the Lithosphere

    Potential Sources for Earthquakes in Northern California

    Pulling the Rug Out from Under California

    Giant Earthquakes Beneath Canada's West Coast

    The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence

    The San Andreas Fault System: General Information, Data, Maps, Charts and Graphics

    Foreshocks & Aftershocks of the Great 1857 Fort Tejon, CA Earthquake

    The Great 1857 Fort Tejon Earthquake: Shake, Rattle & Roll

    Quakes Along Central San Andreas Fault Peak Every Three-Years

    Volcanoes and the San Andreas Fault

    The San Andreas Fault system through the Transverse Ranges as illuminated by earthquakes

    Deep Tremors Along the San Andreas Fault

    Aftershocks of the 1952 Tehachapi Earthquake

    Mantle Downwelling Beneath the Transverse Range


    Graphic: Map of the San Andreas Fault, California Graphic: Map: 1998 Southern California Deformation Graphic: Diagonal Map of the San Andreas Fault, So. California

    San Jacinto Fault Zone Advisories
    &
    MT ULF Updates
    Released by
    GeoSeismic Labs of California


    (View MT ULF REPORTS published in October 2004)



    (View MT ULF REPORTS published in November 2004)



    (View MT ULF REPORTS published in December 2004)



    (View MT ULF REPORTS published in January 2005)



    (View MT ULF REPORTS published in February 2005)



    (View MT ULF REPORTS published in March 2005)



    (View MT ULF REPORTS published in April 2005)



    (View MT ULF REPORTS published in May 2005)



    (View a previously Published MT ULF REPORT



    (View the Currently Published MT ULF REPORT



    MT ULF UPDATE: June 1, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was moderate infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Wednesday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 1.43 Hz (-71.24 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was higher. The ULF mean average was decreased (negative). The MT peak reading was measured at 10.0 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.1 units.

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    General Discussion:
    Infrasonic resonant harmonic activity was extremely active during the past 24 hours. There was peak activity at 0.94 Hz, 1.20 Hz, and within a range from 1.3 Hz to 1.8 Hz. There were no detected ULF suppression incidents. The strong infrasonic resonant harmonic frequency appears to be associated with deep crustal stress in Baja California, Mexico, and further north into Southern California. There was a scattering of infrasonic activity between 18:00 and 23:00 UTC, which was associated with a seismic swarm epicentered north of Yucca Valley, CA. which may be related to the high crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary. Tonight's seismic activity in Central California near Avenal (east of Parkfield) appears to be related to this same high crustal stress now occurring to the southeast along the Mojave Desert Block. Late in the reporting period, I observed a strong MT pulsation (10.00) for a micro quake epicentered 8 miles northwest of Parkfield, CA along the plate boundary in Central California. Regarding the recent landslide at Laguna Beach, CA, I recently read a newspaper article about a geologist who stated shortly after the last deadly mudslide in Ventura County, that if we were to have a strong earthquake, that it would trigger many similar landslides throughout Southern California because of all the record rainfall. So, if you are living in an area prone to hillside slope failure you should be prepared to move to a safer place after a felt strong earthquake.

    Statement Summary:
    It is inferred that the strong infrasonics are related to a rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Southern California. The current infrasonics are inferred to be associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone from Southern California to Central California and may also now be affecting the Owens Valley from Bishop to Coso Junction, CA as it nucleates north, and outside of the Mojave Desert Block, and west along the Garlock fault zone into the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as The San Francisco Bay area. The San Jacinto fault zone and the Anza Seismic Gap was the focus of some of the most recently detected anomalies. We may now potentially be within 30 days of the next strong seismic event epicentered in Southern California. So, continue to stay on alert.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with a small donation, which is entirely appreciated. I believe this to be the fairest method for all.

    Finally, I Hope that everyone had a nice and safe Memorial Day holiday weekend!  -FRANK CONDON


    01-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    01-JUN-2005 15:00 - 18:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    01-JUN-2005 18:00 - 21:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    01-JUN-2005 21:00 - 23:59 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    MT ULF UPDATE: June 2, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was moderate infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Thursday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 1.85 Hz (-73.23 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was higher. The ULF mean average was increased (positive). The MT peak reading was measured at 9.1 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.4 units.

    M3.3 2005/06/02 06:11:02 36.075 -120.164 16.0 7 km ( 4 mi) NW of Avenal, CA
    M3.3 2005/06/02 08:23:47 34.930 -116.723 1.2 29 km ( 18 mi) ENE of Barstow, CA
    M3.5 2005/06/02 14:18:05 35.669 -121.090 5.0 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of San Simeon, CA

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    General Discussion:
    Infrasonic resonant harmonic activity was active during the past 24 hours. There was peak activity at 0.94 Hz, and 1.85 Hz. There were no detected ULF suppression incidents. The moderate infrasonic resonant harmonic frequency appears to be associated with deep crustal stress in Baja California, Mexico, and further north into Southern California. Today's seismic swarm activity epicentered in Central California appears to now be related to high levels of deep crustal stress occurring to the southeast along the Mojave Desert Block.

    Statement Summary:
    It is inferred that the strong infrasonics are related to a rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Southern California. The current infrasonics are inferred to be associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone from Southern California to Central California and may also now be affecting the Owens Valley from Bishop to Coso Junction, CA as it nucleates north, and outside of the Mojave Desert Block, and west along the Garlock fault zone into the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as The San Francisco Bay area. The San Jacinto fault zone and the Anza Seismic Gap was the focus of some of the most recently detected anomalies. We may now potentially be within 30 days of the next strong seismic event epicentered in Southern California. So, continue to stay on alert.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with an occassional small donation, which is commensurate with your particular economic condition. I believe this to be the fairest method for all. So, please send in whatever amount you believe is appropriate.

    Thanks in advance of your participation!-FRANK CONDON


     02-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    MT ULF UPDATE: June 3, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was strong infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Friday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 0.88 Hz (-68.35 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was higher. The ULF mean average was increased (positive). The MT peak reading was measured at 9.3 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.2 units.

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    General Discussion:
    Infrasonic resonant (fundamental) harmonic activity was active during the past 24 hours. There was peak activity at 0.84 to 0.92 Hz. There were no detected ULF suppression incidents. The moderate amplitude infrasonic resonant frequencies appear to be associated with deep crustal stress in Baja California, Mexico, and further north into Southern California along the plate boundary.

    Statement Summary:
    It's inferred that the strong infrasonic resonant frequencies are related to a general rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Baja, and Southern California. The current infrasonic harmonics are associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone( Mojave Desert Block) from Southern to Central California, that may also affect the Southern Owens Valley as it nucleates north, and west along the Garlock fault zone towards the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as San Francisco Bay, and most recently within Central California near Avenal and Parkfield, CA. We may now potentially be within 20 to 30 days of the next strong seismic event epicentered in the Southern California region. The next New Moon will arrive on June 6, 2005. So, continue to stay on alert.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with an occassional small donation, which is commensurate with your particular economic condition. I believe this to be the fairest method for all. So, please send in whatever amount you believe is appropriate.

    Thanks in advance of your participation!-FRANK CONDON


    03-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    03-JUN-2005 21:00 - 23:59 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    04-JUN-2005 00:00 - 03:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    MT ULF UPDATE: June 4, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was strong infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Saturday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 1.24 Hz (-69.61 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was lower. The ULF mean average was decreased (negative). The MT peak reading was measured at 9.1 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.3 units.

    M3.6 2005/06/04 23:52:36 36.237 -120.279 12.5 13 km ( 8 mi) NNE of Coalinga, CA
    M3.0 2005/06/05 00:33:20 41.094 -124.419 22.7 24 km ( 15 mi) W of Trinidad, CA

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    General Discussion:
    Infrasonic resonant (fundamental) harmonic activity was active during the past 24 hours. There was peak activity at 0.84 to 0.92 Hz. There were no detected ULF suppression incidents. The moderate amplitude infrasonic resonant frequencies appear to be associated with deep crustal stress in Baja California, Mexico, and further north into Southern California along the plate boundary.

    Statement Summary:
    It's inferred that the strong infrasonic resonant frequencies are related to a general rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Baja, and Southern California. The current infrasonic harmonics are associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone( Mojave Desert Block) from Southern to Central California, that may also affect the Southern Owens Valley as it nucleates north, and west along the Garlock fault zone towards the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as San Francisco Bay, and most recently within Central California near Avenal and Parkfield, CA. We may now potentially be within 20 to 30 days of the next strong seismic event epicentered in the Southern California region. The New Moon arrives on June 6, 2005. So, continue to stay on alert.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with an occassional small donation, which is commensurate with your particular economic condition. I believe this to be the fairest method for all. So, please send in whatever amount you believe is appropriate.

    Thanks in advance of your participation!-FRANK CONDON


    04-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    04-JUN-2005 15:00 - 18:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    05-JUN-2005 00:00 - 03:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    05-JUN-2005 03:00 - 06:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    MT ULF UPDATE: June 5, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was moderate infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Sunday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 1.66 Hz (-72.02 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was slightly lower. The ULF mean average was unchanged. The MT peak reading was measured at 8.8 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.2 units.

    M5.7 2005/06/05 08:28:50 23.660 -108.366 10.0 126 km ( 78 mi) SW of Eldorado, Mexico

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    Epilog: On June 5, 2005 I issued a short term seismic warning based upon the observation of a strong magneto-telluric disturbance which began around 00:00 UTC. It was ready, and released for publishing three hours later. Five hours later a M5.7 earthquake was epicentered in the Gulf of California near La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico. also, on May 30, 2005 I detected a strong infrasonic fundamental harmonic which was inferred to be for the
    Gulf of California

    5 JUN 2005  (156)
    
         ot  = 08:28:50.73   +/-   0.47              GULF OF CALIFORNIA              
         lat =      23.660   +/-    5.4
         lon =    -108.366   +/-    3.8              MAGNITUDE 5.7 (GS)       
         dep =        10.0  (geophysicist)
    
         160 km (100 miles) SW of Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico (pop 536,000)
         180 km (110 miles) ENE of Cabo San Lucas, Baja Calif. Sur, Mexico
         200 km (125 miles) S of Guamuchil, Sinaloa, Mexico
         1065 km (660 miles) WNW of MEXICO CITY, D.F., Mexico
    

    General Discussion:
    Infrasonic resonant (fundamental) harmonic activity was active during the past 24 hours. There was peak activity at 1.50 to 1.66 Hz. The moderate amplitude infrasonic resonant frequencies appear to be associated with deep crustal stress in Baja California, Mexico, and further north into Southern California along the plate boundary. the latest observations were related to the border region where I detected an overnight increase in MT precursor activity related to micro quakes near Borrego Springs, Ocotillo, and Mexicali, Mexico.

    Statement Summary:
    It's inferred that the strong infrasonic resonant frequencies are related to a general rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Baja, and Southern California. The current infrasonic harmonics are associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone( Mojave Desert Block) from Southern to Central California, that may also affect the Southern Owens Valley as it nucleates north, and west along the Garlock fault zone towards the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as San Francisco Bay, and most recently within Central California near Avenal and Parkfield, CA. The latest observations are indicating that crustal stress is also high in Northern Baja, Californa, Mexico. We may now potentially be within 20 to 30 days of the next strong seismic event epicentered in the Southern California region. The New Moon arrives on June 6, 2005. So, continue to stay on alert.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with an occassional small donation, which is commensurate with your particular economic condition. I believe this to be the fairest method for all. So, please send in whatever amount you believe is appropriate.

    Thanks in advance of your participation!-FRANK CONDON


    05-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    05-JUN-2005 21:00 - 23:59 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    MT ULF UPDATE: June 6, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was strong infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Monday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 0.79 Hz (-68.75 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was slightly lower. The ULF mean average was decreased (negative). The MT peak reading was measured at 8.7 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.2 units.

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    General Discussion:
    Infrasonic resonant (fundamental) harmonic activity was strong and active during the past 24 hours. There was peak activity at 0.79 Hz. The moderate amplitude infrasonic resonant frequencies appear to be associated with deep crustal stress in Baja California, Mexico, and further north into Southern California along the plate boundary. the latest observations were related to an inferred increased level of in the nucleation of deep crustal stress out of the Mojave Desert Block / ECSZ near Ludlow, CA, which is apparently also affecting the high crustal stress zone in South-Central California near the Tehachapi / Grapevine region from Taft to Frazier Park, CA. A revised alert was issued which was based upon this latest observation. There was also an observed high frequency ULF signal burst at the time of the inferred nucleation incident, indicating that deep crustal energy is now rising towards the surface in the ECSZ.

    Statement Summary:
    It's inferred that the strong infrasonic resonant frequencies are related to a general rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Baja, and Southern California. The current infrasonic harmonics are associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone( Mojave Desert Block) from Southern to Central California, that may also affect the Southern Owens Valley as it nucleates north, and west along the Garlock fault zone towards the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as San Francisco Bay, and most recently within Central California near Avenal and Parkfield, CA. The latest observations are indicating that crustal stress is also high in Northern Baja, Californa, Mexico. We may now potentially be within 20 to 30 days of the next strong seismic event epicentered in the Southern California region.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with an occassional small donation, which is commensurate with your particular economic condition. I believe this to be the fairest method for all. So, please send in whatever amount you believe is appropriate.

    Thanks in advance of your participation!-FRANK CONDON


    06-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    06-JUN-2005 21:00 - 23:59 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    07-JUN-2005 00:00 - 03:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    07-JUN-2005 03:00 - 06:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    MT ULF UPDATE: June 7, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was moderate infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Tuesday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 0.156 Hz (-71.84 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was unchanged. The ULF mean average was basically unchanged. The MT peak reading was measured at 8.8 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.1 units.

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    General Discussion:
    Infrasonic resonant (fundamental) harmonic activity was moderate in activity during the past 24 hours. There was peak activity at 0.156 Hz. The moderate amplitude infrasonic resonant frequencies appear to be associated with deep crustal stress along the plate boundary. There were a couple more micro quakes epicentered close to the location near Ludlow where I inferred that a nucleation of crustal stress had taken place from out of the ECSZ / Mojave Desert Block, which apparently is also affecting the high crustal stress point in South-Central California near the Tehachapi / Grapevine region, and Taft to Frazier Park, CA. The level of MT related piezomagnetic activity was moderate with some indications that it was also associated with the Mojave Desert Block/ ECSZ. and we need to stay on alert as this situation continues into mid-week.

    Statement Summary:
    It's inferred that the strong infrasonic resonant frequencies are related to a general rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Baja, and Southern California. The current infrasonic harmonics are associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone( Mojave Desert Block) from Southern to Central California, that may also affect the Southern Owens Valley as it nucleates north, and west along the Garlock fault zone towards the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as San Francisco Bay, and most recently within Central California near Avenal and Parkfield, CA. The latest observations are indicating that crustal stress is also high in Northern Baja, Californa, Mexico. We may now potentially be within 15 to 25 days of the next strong seismic event epicentered in the Southern California region.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with an occassional small donation, which is commensurate with your particular economic condition. I believe this to be the fairest method for all. So, please send in whatever amount you believe is appropriate.

    Thanks in advance of your participation!-FRANK CONDON


    07-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    MT ULF UPDATE: June 8, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was moderate infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Wednesday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 1.81 Hz (-71.25 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was slightly higher. The ULF mean average was decreased (negative). The MT peak reading was measured at 8.8 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.0 units.

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    General Discussion:
    Infrasonic resonant (fundamental) harmonic activity was moderate in activity during the past 24 hours. Yesterday's peak activity at 0.156 Hz appears to be related to the strongest eruption in the past twenty years at the Colima Volcano in Cental Mexico. Also, this is the second time in recent days that this particular frequency has increased in its amplitude just prior to a strong eruption at the Colima volcano. Yesterday's nucleation of crustal stress out of the ECSZ / Mojave Desert Block, manisfested itself in a couple of micro quake along the Central Garlock Fault Zone near Randsburg, CA. That particular period of time was also accompanied by a series of infrasonic pulses during the late afternoon period and just prior to 5PM local time. The level of MT related piezomagnetic activity was also moderate to strong with some indications that it was also associated with the Mojave Desert Block/ ECSZ. We need to stay on alert as this situation continues into mid-week.

    Statement Summary:
    It's inferred that the strong infrasonic resonant frequencies are related to a general rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Baja, and Southern California. The current infrasonic harmonics are associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone( Mojave Desert Block) from Southern to Central California, that may also affect the Southern Owens Valley as it nucleates north, and west along the Garlock fault zone towards the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as San Francisco Bay, and most recently within Central California near Avenal and Parkfield, CA. The latest observations are indicating that crustal stress is also high in Northern Baja, Californa, Mexico. We may now potentially be within 20 days of the next strong seismic event epicentered in the Southern California region.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with an occassional small donation, which is commensurate with your particular economic condition. I believe this to be the fairest method for all. So, please send in whatever amount you believe is appropriate.

    Thanks in advance of your participation!-FRANK CONDON


    08-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    09-JUN-2005 21:00 - 23:59 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    MT ULF UPDATE: June 9, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was moderate infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Thursday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 1.20 Hz (-70.00 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was unchanged. The ULF mean average was decreased (negative). The MT peak reading was measured at 8.6 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.0 units.

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    General Discussion:
    Infrasonic resonant (fundamental) harmonic activity was moderate in activity during the past 24 hours. As the result of an in depth re-analysis, I'm revising the inferred location for a series of strong infrasonic pulsations to be coming from within the Inland Empire instead of the ECSZ and the Garlock fault zone. The series of strong pulsations are indicating that deep crustal stress over the past 72 hours has increased along the San Jacinto fault zone near Colton, Beaumont, and Idyllwild, CA. Also, the Anza Seismic Gap may also be involved in this significant increase in deep harmonic activity from the San Jacinto fault in the Inland Empire. So, keep on an alert status until further notice.

    Statement Summary:
    It's inferred that the strong infrasonic resonant frequencies are related to a general rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Baja, and Southern California. The current infrasonic harmonics are associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone( Mojave Desert Block) from Southern to Central California, that may also affect the Southern Owens Valley as it nucleates north, and west along the Garlock fault zone towards the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as San Francisco Bay, and most recently within Central California near Avenal and Parkfield, CA. The latest observations are indicating that crustal stress is also high in Northern Baja, Californa, Mexico. We may now potentially be within 20 days of the next strong seismic event epicentered in the Southern California region.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with an occassional small donation, which is commensurate with your particular economic condition. I believe this to be the fairest method for all. So, please send in whatever amount you believe is appropriate.

    Thanks in advance of your participation!-FRANK CONDON


    09-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    09-JUN-2005 18:00 - 21:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    MT ULF UPDATE: June 10, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was moderate infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Friday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 1.38 Hz (-71.05 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was slightly higher. The ULF mean average was basically unchanged. The MT peak reading was measured at 8.8 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.1 units.

    M3.3 2005/06/10 23:56:35 40.389 -117.636 8.9 36 km ( 22 mi) WNW of McCoy, NV

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    General Discussion:
    On Friday, there was one period with strong fundamental Infrasonic Harmonic Frequency activity from between 5:00PM and 8:00PM local time, which appears to be related to a micro quake epicentered in the Pine Mountain-Mettler Region of South-Central California. Earlier, I observed a typical scattering pattern of the infrasonic wave activity prior to a micro quake epicentered several miles north of Yucca Valley, CA (ECSZ).

    Statement Summary:
    It's inferred that the strong infrasonic resonant frequencies are related to a general rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Baja, and Southern California. The current infrasonic harmonics are associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone( Mojave Desert Block) from Southern to Central California, that may also affect the Southern Owens Valley as it nucleates north, and west along the Garlock fault zone towards the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as San Francisco Bay, and most recently within Central California near Avenal and Parkfield, CA. The latest observations are indicating that crustal stress is also high in Northern Baja, Californa, Mexico. We may now potentially be within 3 weeks of the next strong seismic event epicentered in the Southern California region. There is a greater propensity for an event of this magnitude during an upcoming extremely low transit of the Full Moon, where it won't even become visible above the horizon at Fairbanks, Alaska. The low path of the Full Moon is also going to give us some unusually high spring tides at mid-latitudes during Perigee. So, that could be the catalyst for triggering an area which is known to be overdue for having its next major earthquake. Note: Perigee arrives 32 hours after the next Full Moon, which is on June 21st.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with an occassional small donation, which is commensurate with your particular economic condition. I believe this to be the fairest method for all. So, please send in whatever amount you believe is appropriate.

    Thanks in advance of your participation!-FRANK CONDON


    10-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    10-JUN-2005 21:00 - 23:59 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    11-JUN-2005 00:00 - 03:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    MT ULF UPDATE: June 11, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was moderate infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Saturday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 1.56 Hz (-71.68 dBv), along with a lesser amplitude harmonic at 0.94 Hz (-74.56 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was slightly higher. The ULF mean average was basically unchanged. The MT peak reading was measured at 8.7 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.0 units. <

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    General Discussion:
    On Saturday, there was one period with moderate strength fundamental Infrasonic Harmonic Frequency activity from between 13:30 and 17:30 UTC, with shorter duration periods from 17:30 until 19:30 UTC.

    Statement Summary:
    It's inferred that the strong infrasonic resonant frequencies are related to a general rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Baja, and Southern California. The current infrasonic harmonics are associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone( Mojave Desert Block) from Southern to Central California, that may also affect the Southern Owens Valley as it nucleates north, and west along the Garlock fault zone towards the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as San Francisco Bay, and most recently within Central California near Avenal and Parkfield, CA. The latest observations are indicating that crustal stress is also high in Northern Baja, Californa, Mexico. We may now potentially be within 3 weeks of the next strong seismic event epicentered in the Southern California region. There is a greater propensity for an event of this magnitude during an upcoming extremely low transit of the Full Moon, where it won't even become visible above the horizon at Fairbanks, Alaska. The low path of the Full Moon is also going to give us some unusually high spring tides at mid-latitudes during Perigee. So, that could be the catalyst for triggering an area which is known to be overdue for having its next major earthquake. Note: Perigee arrives 32 hours after the next Full Moon, which is on June 21st.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with an occassional small donation, which is commensurate with your particular economic condition. I believe this to be the fairest method for all. So, please send in whatever amount you believe is appropriate.

    Thanks in advance of your participation!-FRANK CONDON


    11-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    MT ULF UPDATE: June 12, 2005

    Note: The San Jacinto Fault Alert along with Inland Empire advisory continues to stay in effect. There was moderate infrasonic harmonic resonant activity below 2 Hz on Sunday. The Peak (Crustal) Infrasonic Harmonic Resonant Frequency was measured at 1.28 Hz (-70.24 dBv). The ULF and MT activity level was low to moderate during the past 24 hours. The inferred mean average unclamping level was slightly higher. The ULF mean average was basically unchanged. The MT peak reading was measured at 8.7 units of regional lithospheric stress. The MT mean average was measured at 8.0 units. There was a geomagnetic transient excursion which was detected early in the period that caused a geomagnetic storm which peaked during a period with high seismic activity in Southern California.

    M5.6 2005/06/12 15:41:46 33.533 -116.578 14.1 9 km ( 6 mi) ESE of Anza, CA
    M3.1 2005/06/12 20:47:47 33.500 -116.571 12.6 11 km ( 7 mi) ESE of Anza, CA

    All daily charts were updated to reflect the latest analysis.

    General Discussion:
    On Sunday, there was a moderate earthquake epicentered within the Anza Seismic Gap near Anza, California. It appears that the trigger for this already high crustal stress zone was a transient geomagnetic excursion that was detected early in the reporting period. The ensuing geomagnetic storm peaked out just prior to its switch into negative bz territory. The storm appears to have caused enough of a stress increase along the San Jacinto fault zone to have caused a M5.6 seismic event. If not for the storm, the area would have been delayed for a while longer. There was very little change detected after the M5.6 and the situation appears to be the same at last check. The danger comes next when the high spring tides arrive during the next Full Moon and Perigee, 32 hours later. The area from South-Central to Southern California should remain on alert for a chance that another geomagnetic disturbance could change the time schedule again, as it did on Sunday. One interesting factor was that infrasonic resonant harmonics were quite active for several hours prior to the Anza Earthquake, also indicating that the region was already under high lithospheric stress prior to the arrival of the trigger mechanism. Crustal stress now appears to have nucleated further northwest towards the Cajon Pass. The Riverside to Lytle Creek Seismic Gap should be considered at high risk, according to the infrasonics. The Inland Empire should now be on Full Alert at this time. Maybe it would be an excellent idea to schedule an earthquake drill at work or at school. We definitely are in the middle of something happening at both the north and south ends of the San Bernardino Valley region. Other faults which need to be monitored are the Southern San Andreas, Helendale, Eastern Sierra Madre-Cucamonga, Rialto-Colton, Banning, and the entire San Jacinto fault zone should now be at the focus of this short term alert.

    Epilog:
    Begining on June 6, 2005 until June 9, 2005 I detected a series of high amplitude infrasonic resonant harmonic pulsations that were from three specific areas in the Inland Empire. Colton, Beaumont, and Idyllwild were the specific targets of a similar infrasonic disturbance, which peaked out just prior to the June 9, 2005 M3.1 earthquake at Anza, CA. I immediately stepped up my analysis of all anomalies. My conclusion as published on June 10, 2005 was that the San Jacinto fault was at an immediate high risk for having a major earthquake within the next three weeks, and included the Anza Seismic Gap as the inferred to be at high risk epicentric location.

    12 JUN 2005  (163)
    
         ot  = 15:41:46.00   +/-   0.00         SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA             
         lat =      33.532   +/-    0.0
         lon =    -116.567   +/-    0.0              MAGNITUDE 5.6 (PAS)      
         dep =        13.5   +/-    0.0   
    
         35 km (20 miles) S of Palm Springs, California (pop 42,000)
         35 km (20 miles) NNW of Borrego Springs, California (pop 2,500)
         40 km (25 miles) WSW of Indio, California (pop 49,000)
         715 km (445 miles) SE of SACRAMENTO, California
    


    Statement Summary:
    It's inferred that the strong infrasonic resonant frequencies are related to a general rise in deep crustal stress along the Pacific & North American Plate Boundary in Baja, and Southern California. The current infrasonic harmonics are associated with high crustal stress along the San Andreas fault zone( Mojave Desert Block) from Southern to Central California, that may also affect the Southern Owens Valley as it nucleates north, and west along the Garlock fault zone towards the Central California Coastal region near San Simeon, CA (Pine Mountain-Big Pine faults). Also, appears to be affecting crustal stress levels as far north as San Francisco Bay, and most recently within Central California near Avenal and Parkfield, CA. The latest observations are indicating that crustal stress is also high in Northern Baja, Californa, Mexico. We may now potentially be within 3 weeks of the next strong seismic event epicentered in the Southern California region. There is a greater propensity for an event of this magnitude during an upcoming extremely low transit of the Full Moon, where it won't even become visible above the horizon at Fairbanks, Alaska. The low path of the Full Moon is also going to give us some unusually high spring tides at mid-latitudes during Perigee. So, that could be the catalyst for triggering an area which is known to be overdue for having its next major earthquake. Note: Perigee arrives 32 hours after the next Full Moon, which is on June 21st.

    Critical Reminder:
    All donations should be sent in to the lab prior to next June 15th 2005. Your contributions will be used to offset the cost of maintaining the website, which is currently over one thousand dollars per year. It's your web-site, too. Your support is essential to it being in operation 24/7. Prior to 2004, I went on a "summer schedule." If I get the proper financial support for maintaining the release of the vital information provided here, I may not have to resort to a reduced schedule this coming Summer. I prefer to give out the information to everyone without any restrictions. Those who can afford one, should sponsor my pioneering efforts with an occassional small donation, which is commensurate with your particular economic condition. I believe this to be the fairest method for all. So, please send in whatever amount you believe is appropriate.

    Thanks in advance of your participation!-FRANK CONDON


    12-JUN-2005: 24 Hour Geomagnetic and Magneto-Telluric Graph


    11-JUN-2005 15:00 - 18:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    11-JUN-2005 18:00 - 21:00 UTC
    ECSZ Mojave Desert Block: Infrasonic Spectrogram


    Scientific Earthquake Prediction is by no means an exact science, and much more work still needs completion before it's out of the experimental stages of development. You can compare this with looking at the Moon through a telescope, and arriving in a spaceship at Trinity Base. We are still looking at it through a focused lens and just beginning to take the step into outer space via satellite detection. My goal is to fill in the gaps down here at earth level. the Mojave segment along the San Andreas fault, the Garlock fault, the San Jacinto fault, and the Mojave Desert Block are my favorite subjects. From the Gulf of California to Parkfield in Central California is my general zone of exploratory research. Anything outside of this is done for extra credit.

    Remember, your monetary contributions provide the necessary resources which allow the graphics, informational updates & narratives provided here to be published in such a timely manner.

    How to Send a Contribution to the Lab

    Top of Current Page



    NORTH AMERICAN VOLCANIC UNREST and ERUPTION UPDATES


  • Observatorio Vulcanológico Colima-Mexico

  • Latest Colima Volcano Update

  • CENEPRED-Mexico

  • Latest Popocatépetl Volcano Update

  • AVO-Alaska

  • Alaska Volcano Observatory

    Activity Level of all Monitored Alaskan & Kamchatkan Volcanoes

    Aleutian Islands

    Latest Korovin Volcano Update

    Cook Inlet:

    Latest Mount Spurr Update

    Alaska Peninsula:

    Latest Mount Veniaminof Update

  • CVO-Pacific Northwest:

  • Cascades Volcano Observatory

    Cascades:

    Latest Mount Saint Helens Update
  • YVO-Rocky Mountains

  • Yellowstone Volcano Observatory



    LUNAR-TIDAL AND SOLAR PERIODICITIES RELATED TO EARTHQUAKES

    Can the Moon Cause Earthquakes?

    (Tidal)Triggering Factor of Strong Earthquakes and Its Prediction Verification

    Tidal Triggering: Caught in the Act


    Tides & Tide Prediction


    Monthly Lunar-Tidal Calendar and
    Narrative for Central and Southern California Coasts

    San Simeon:
    The next New Moon and resulting Spring Tides will be on June 6, 2005 (21:58 UTC); with a predicted differential of 6.83 feet, and a significant lunar-tidal phase angle(transition) between 04:42 UTC (06/06/2005) and 12:07 UTC (06/06/2005) along the coast of Central California.

    The next Full Moon and resulting Spring Tides will be on June 22, 2005 (04:16 UTC); with a predicted maximum differential of 8.39 feet, and a significant lunar-tidal phase angle (transition) 32 hours later at Perigee, between 05:47 UTC (06/23/2005) and 13:19 UTC (06/23/2005) along the coast of Central California.


    Newport Beach:
    The next New Moon and resulting Spring Tides will be on June 6, 2005 (21:58 UTC) with a predicted differential of 6.67 feet, with a significant lunar-tidal phase angle(transition) between 03:37 UTC (06/06/2005) and 11:09 UTC (06/06/2005) along the coast of Southern California.

    The next Full Moon and resulting Spring Tides will be on June 22, 2005 (04:16 UTC); with a predicted maximum differential of 8.30 feet, and a significant lunar-tidal phase angle (transition) 32 hours later at Perigee, between 04:42 UTC (06/23/2005) and 12:21 UTC (06/23/2005) along the coast of Southern California.


    Cape Mendocino, California
    5 June 2005 - 7 June 2005
    40.4333° N, 124.4166° W
    
    2005-06-05  03:44 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-05  05:01 UTC   6.13 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-05  12:29 UTC  -0.92 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-05  12:48 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-05  19:10 UTC   4.27 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-05  23:54 UTC   2.66 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-06  03:44 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-06  05:35 UTC   6.08 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-06  12:47 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-06  13:07 UTC  -1.07 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-06  20:01 UTC   4.34 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-06  21:58 UTC   New Moon
    2005-06-07  00:37 UTC   2.92 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-07  03:45 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-07  06:08 UTC   5.97 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-07  12:47 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-07  13:44 UTC  -1.09 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-07  20:47 UTC   4.36 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-08  01:20 UTC   3.11 feet  Low Tide
    

    Point Bonita, Bonita Cove, San Francisco Bay, California
    5 June 2005 - 7 June 2005
    37.8183° N, 122.5283° W
    
    2005-06-05  03:28 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-05  05:12 UTC   6.53 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-05  12:18 UTC  -0.92 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-05  12:48 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-05  19:21 UTC   4.67 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-05  23:43 UTC   2.66 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-06  03:29 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-06  05:46 UTC   6.48 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-06  12:48 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-06  12:56 UTC  -1.07 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-06  20:12 UTC   4.74 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-06  21:58 UTC   New Moon
    2005-06-07  00:26 UTC   2.92 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-07  03:29 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-07  06:19 UTC   6.37 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-07  12:48 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-07  13:33 UTC  -1.09 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-07  20:58 UTC   4.76 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-08  01:09 UTC   3.11 feet  Low Tide
    

    San Simeon, California
    5 June 2005 - 7 June 2005
    35.6417° N, 121.1883° W
    
    2005-06-05  03:17 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-05  04:11 UTC   5.98 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-05  11:29 UTC  -0.74 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-05  12:49 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-05  17:54 UTC   3.45 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-05  22:23 UTC   2.02 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-06  03:17 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-06  04:42 UTC   5.99 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-06  12:07 UTC  -0.84 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-06  12:48 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-06  18:40 UTC   3.39 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-06  21:58 UTC   New Moon
    2005-06-06  22:55 UTC   2.24 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-07  03:18 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-07  05:14 UTC   5.93 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-07  12:44 UTC  -0.81 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-07  12:48 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-07  19:25 UTC   3.32 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-07  23:27 UTC   2.41 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-08  03:18 UTC   Sunset
    

    Balboa Pier, Newport Beach, California
    5 June 2005 - 7 June 2005
    33.6000° N, 117.9000° W
    
    2005-06-05  02:58 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-05  03:06 UTC   5.92 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-05  10:31 UTC  -0.73 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-05  12:41 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-05  16:49 UTC   3.41 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-05  21:25 UTC   2.00 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-06  02:59 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-06  03:37 UTC   5.93 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-06  11:09 UTC  -0.83 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-06  12:41 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-06  17:35 UTC   3.35 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-06  21:57 UTC   2.21 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-06  21:58 UTC   New Moon
    2005-06-07  02:59 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-07  04:09 UTC   5.87 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-07  11:46 UTC  -0.81 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-07  12:41 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-07  18:20 UTC   3.29 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-07  22:29 UTC   2.39 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-08  03:00 UTC   Sunset
    

    Cape Mendocino, California
    21 June 2005 - 23 June 2005
    40.4333° N, 124.4166° W
    
    2005-06-21  03:51 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-21  05:04 UTC   6.57 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-21  12:39 UTC  -1.59 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-21  12:47 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-21  19:39 UTC   4.39 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-22  00:06 UTC   3.05 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-22  03:51 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-22  04:16 UTC   Full Moon
    2005-06-22  05:51 UTC   6.74 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-22  12:47 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-22  13:25 UTC  -1.87 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-22  20:27 UTC   4.56 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-23  00:58 UTC   3.08 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-23  03:51 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-23  06:41 UTC   6.79 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-23  12:47 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-23  14:13 UTC  -1.94 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-23  21:14 UTC   4.70 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-24  01:54 UTC   3.04 feet  Low Tide
    

    Point Bonita, Bonita Cove, San Francisco Bay, California
    21 June 2005 - 23 June 2005
    37.8183° N, 122.5283° W
    
    2005-06-21  03:35 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-21  05:15 UTC   6.97 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-21  12:28 UTC  -1.59 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-21  12:48 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-21  19:50 UTC   4.79 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-21  23:55 UTC   3.05 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-22  03:35 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-22  04:16 UTC   Full Moon
    2005-06-22  06:02 UTC   7.14 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-22  12:48 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-22  13:14 UTC  -1.87 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-22  20:38 UTC   4.96 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-23  00:47 UTC   3.08 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-23  03:35 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-23  06:52 UTC   7.19 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-23  12:48 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-23  14:02 UTC  -1.94 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-23  21:25 UTC   5.10 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-24  01:43 UTC   3.04 feet  Low Tide
    

    San Simeon, California
    21 June 2005 - 23 June 2005
    35.6417° N, 121.1883° W
    
    2005-06-21  03:23 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-21  04:16 UTC   6.49 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-21  11:46 UTC  -1.32 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-21  12:49 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-21  18:22 UTC   3.59 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-21  22:39 UTC   2.22 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-22  03:23 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-22  04:16 UTC   Full Moon
    2005-06-22  05:00 UTC   6.71 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-22  12:32 UTC  -1.58 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-22  12:49 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-22  19:11 UTC   3.67 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-22  23:27 UTC   2.27 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-23  03:24 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-23  05:47 UTC   6.76 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-23  12:49 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-23  13:19 UTC  -1.63 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-23  20:02 UTC   3.75 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-24  00:20 UTC   2.32 feet  Low Tide
    

    Balboa Pier, Newport Beach, California
    21 June 2005 - 23 June 2005
    33.6000° N, 117.9000° W
    
    2005-06-21  03:04 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-21  03:11 UTC   6.42 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-21  10:48 UTC  -1.31 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-21  12:41 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-21  17:17 UTC   3.56 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-21  21:41 UTC   2.20 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-22  03:05 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-22  03:55 UTC   6.64 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-22  04:16 UTC   Full Moon
    2005-06-22  11:34 UTC  -1.56 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-22  12:42 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-22  18:06 UTC   3.63 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-22  22:29 UTC   2.25 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-23  03:05 UTC   Sunset
    2005-06-23  04:42 UTC   6.70 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-23  12:21 UTC  -1.61 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-23  12:42 UTC   Sunrise
    2005-06-23  18:57 UTC   3.71 feet  High Tide
    2005-06-23  23:22 UTC   2.29 feet  Low Tide
    2005-06-24  03:05 UTC   Sunset
    


    NOAA: Near-Real Time Data


    NOAA Tides for California Coastal Regions



    Space Weather Alerts and Warnings Timeline



    Regarding Donations for GeoSeismic Labs

    Donations made by direct contribution are vitally important to keep the lab in operation through the year. An item that needs emphasis is the annual operating cost related to being a public corporation within the state of California; a fee which is Eight Hundred Dollars, and paid for the privilege of being a public entity. Last fiscal year (4/1/04 - 03/31/05), I directly paid to the State Secretary approximately 2 Thousand Dollars in Franchise Tax Fees to keep the lab solvent and fully chartered with the State of California. Your donations will basically cover the cost of keeping the web site operating 24/7. The depth of my research is increasing exponentially as events occur and I focus my research upon them. My 365 days of ground-breaking reports, will keep you informed and prepared for the future.


    IMPORTANT:
    For those who elect to send a personal check or postal money order
    Please send an email request to the address listed on my website for instructions.

    Also, All credit card funded donations using the automatic Paypal donation button will be rejected unless you request easy to follow alternate instructions via email and follow them completely.
    You may also use the Amazon.com donation button placed on various pages of the website. Also, any further questions you may have, should be sent to the email address that is listed within. Thank you,

    Frank Condon -GeoSeismic Labs 2005

    MT ULF Charts and Experimental Forecast

    The Latest Near Real-Time Data from GeoSeismic Labs

    The Southern California Seismic Alert

    The most recent 24 hr. MT peak reading (13-JUN-2005 03:00 UTC) was
    measured at 8.7 units of regional lithospheric stress.


    Graphic: Chart for Regional Lithospheric Stress Level

    Graphic: Chart for Regional Lithospheric Stress Level

    Graphic: Chart for ULF Activity Level

    Graphic: Chart for Global Seismicity vs. Mean Average ULF

    Graphic: Chart for ULF STD DEV

    Graphic:(AE)Unclamping Level Chart

    Graphic: Chart for ULF Mean Average

    Graphic: Recent ULF Report

    Graphic: Recent Anomalies Report

    Graphic: Recent Anomalies Report

    Graphic: Recent Anomalies Report

    Graphic: Recent Anomalies Report

    Graphic: Recent Anomalies Report

    Graphic: Recent Anomalies Report

    Graphic: Recent Anomalies Report

    Graphic: Recent Anomalies Report

    Graphic: Gulf of CA ULF Precursor

    Graphic: Mount Saint Helens Volcano, WA

    Graphic: Piezo Central Creeping Segment SAF

    Graphic: Locked Big Bend ULF Signal Burst SAF

    Graphic: Gulf of CA ULF Precursor

    Graphic: Santa Barbara ULF Precursor

    Graphic: Parkfield Piezo Precursor

    Graphic: Gulf of CA MT Precursor

    Graphic:(AE)Infrasonic Spectrogram A Series of High Amplitude Infrasonic Pulsations that were Detected on June 6, 2005 between 21:00 and 23:30 UTC, and Inferred to be Associated with a Nucleation of Deep Crustal Stress along the San Jacinto Fault Zone Near Idyllwild, CA

    M1.2 2005/06/06 22:52:07 UTC 33.681N 116.762W Depth:14.8 km 8 km ( 5 mi) SSW of Idyllwild, CA Thomas Mountain Fault( San Jacinto Fault Zone) WNW of Lake Hemet, CA.

    Graphic:(AE)Infrasonic Spectrogram A Series of High Amplitude Infrasonic Pulsations that were Detected on June 8, 2005 between 22:30 and 23:00 UTC, and Inferred to be Associated with a Nucleation of Deep Crustal Stress at San Gorgonio Pass Near Beaumont, CA

    M1.2 2005/06/08 22:34:16 UTC 33.903N 116.965W Depth: 6.9 km 2 km ( 2 mi) SSE of Beaumont, CA Between the Banning and San Jacinto faults (San Gorgonio Pass Fault Zone).

    Graphic:(AE)Infrasonic Spectrogram A Series of High Amplitude Infrasonic Pulsations that were Detected on June 9, 2005 between 18:00 and 21:00 UTC, and inferred to be associated with a nucleation of deep crustal stress along the Rialto-Colton and the San Jacinto fault at Colton, CA

    M1.7 2005/06/09 20:30:55 UTC 34.071N 117.302W depth: 16.6 km 2 km ( 1 mi) ENE of Colton, CA Rialto-Colton Fault / San Jacinto Fault Zone (Inland Empire).

    Graphic:(AE)Infrasonic Spectrogram A moderate strength Infrasonic Harmonic Wave, which appears to be associated with the Pine Mountain- Mettler region of South-Central California, just west of the Grapevine.

    M1.7 2005/06/11 02:17:51 35.092N 119.156W Depth: 23.9 km 17 km ( 11 mi) W of Mettler, CA San Andreas / Garlock Fault Zone (South-Central CA).



    This information is provided as a public service by GeoSeismic Labs of California, a State Registered "Not for Profit" Corporation Since 2001.

    REMEMBER GEOSEISMIC LABS IS FUNDED BY DONATIONS FROM INDIVIDUALS LIKE YOU... SO PLEASE HELP!